|
Hungarian
Banking Association
Report
On Activities
2002
Budapest,
March 20, 2003
CONTENTS
I. ASSOCIATION
LIFE, CONFERENCES *
1. Basel
Accord II. *
2. Seminar
on EU financial legislation *
3. Seminar
on money and capital market legislation and decision making
system in the European Union *
4. Changing
accounting standards - IAS 2005 *
5. Visit
of Mr Ernst Welteke, President of Bundesbank *
6. Visits
by international financial organisations *
7. Conference
aimed at presenting the Polish Debtors Database *
8. Activities
of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Working
Group *
9. Consultation
on issues related to general practitioner financing *
10. Ad
Hoc Committee on Reporting *
11. Money
and Capital Market Arbitration Court *
12. Press
meeting *
13. Home
page *
II.
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES *
1. Act
LXIV of 2002 on Amendments to Certain Financial Acts *
1.1
Amendment to the Act on Credit Institutions and Financial
Enterprises (Act CXII of 1996) *
1.2
Amendment to the Capital Market Act *
1.3
Amendment to the Act on Building Societies *
1.4
Private Debtors’ Positive List Database *
2. Common
project for developing electronic signature certificates
for telebanking *
2.1
Activities of the Working Group on Electronic Signatures *
2.2
Status of the common electronic signature certificate *
3. Measures
for the prevention and impeding of money laundering *
4. Bank
security *
5. Reporting
requirements *
6. Motion
to the Constitutional Court on Act CXVI on the National
Land Fund and Act CXVII amending Act LV of 1994 on Arable
Land *
7. Other
professional issues *
III.
LOAN SCHEMES *
1.
Agricultural evolution loans *
2.
Settlement of short-term agricultural loan debts *
2.
1. Legal framework *
2.
2. Preparations by banks *
2.
3. Implementation *
2.
4. Results of the scheme *
3.
Intervention purchases of wheat and corn *
4. Student
loans *
5.
Abolition of the liquidation loan facility *
IV. INTERNATIONAL
COOPERATION *
1. European
Banking Federation *
1.1
Banking Supervision Committee *
1.2
Accounts Committee *
1.3
Fiscal Committee *
1.4
Annual meeting of associate members of the European Banking
Federation *
1.5
Payment Systems Steering Group *
1.6
Bank Security Working Group *
2. Single
interest representation organisation of European payment
institutions *
- ASSOCIATION
LIFE, CONFERENCES
Tasks
related to promoting bank’s preparations for Hungary’s accession
to the European Union were a priority in the Association’s
activities in 2002. Conferences addressing the key issues
of capital adequacy requirements (Basel II), accounting standards
and money and capital market regulation were organised with
the participation of international experts, with consultation
opportunities for specialists from our member banks. With
the Association’s help, bank specialists attended the retail
banking seminar organised by ATTF Luxembourg, with presentations
held by recognised experts of the profession.
Main
conferences and seminars organised by the Association:
- Basel
Accord II.
A
one-day seminar on Basel Accord II was organised by the
Association in February. Presenters at the seminar reviewed
the main elements of the Basel proposal (approximation of
regulatory capital to economic capital, consistent use of
the three pillars, computation of capital requirements for
credit risk under the standard and IRB approaches, capital
requirements for operational risk, the principle of supervisory
reviews, market discipline); typical market actor opinions
were outlined and preparations by Hungarian banks were also
presented. Presenters included professionals from the National
Bank of Hungary, the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority,
the Hungarian Banking Association, CA IB, CIB Bank, Hungarian
Foreign Trade Bank and Raiffeisen Bank. Banks showed keen
interest in the seminar; transcripts of the lectures were
published in Volume 2 of the Association’s Credit Institutions
Review (Hitelintézeti Szemle).
- Seminar
on EU financial legislation
A
seminar for bankers and legal counsels on EU financial legislation
was organised by TAIEX (Technical Assistance Information
Exchange Office) and ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives
Association) in cooperation with the Hungarian Banking Association
on September 26. The objective of the seminar was to present
legislative work and law application in the EU and to review
the related preparations and specificities in Hungary.
- Seminar
on money and capital market legislation and decision making
system in the European Union
A
seminar titled "Money and Capital Market Regulation
and Decision Making Process in the European Union"
was held in December 2002 by the Hungarian Banking Association
with the professional support of the Brussels and Budapest
offices of the international law office White & Case.
The seminar was attended by legal counsels from member banks,
colleagues from other areas (compliance, treasury, risk
management), as well as representatives from the Ministry
of Finance, the National Bank of Hungary and the Hungarian
Financial Supervisory Authority.
At
the seminar it was emphasised that with the approach of
the country’s accession to the European Union, financial
legislation in Hungary is facing a special situation: a
significant part of the legislation can be considered as
harmonised with EU legislation; however, EU legislation
is undergoing significant and continuous changes and these
changes have to be continuously followed up; through its
involvement in the work of the various professional committees
of the European Banking Federation, the Hungarian Banking
Association is doing its best to acquire first-hand information
and follow the relevant EU legislation. Lectures was offered
on the EU decision making mechanism, its main bodies, the
need to speed up the legislative process, proposed reforms
for a single supervision of financial institutions, cross-border
financial services and new regulations taking effect in
Hungary upon accession.
- Changing
accounting standards - IAS 2005
The
Hungarian Banking Association, with the professional support
of PricewaterhouseCoopers, organised in December an all
day professional seminar with the title "Changing Accounting
Standards - IAS 2005". The program of this seminar,
followed with keen interest, included lectures on the planned
harmonisation of Hungarian accounting standards, comparison
of various accounting standards, practical experience in
the introduction of IAS 39, advantages and problems related
to fair value accounting, the connection between IAS and
Basel II as well as practical issues related to the application
of Hungarian accounting standards. The lectures were held
by professionals from the Ministry of Finance, PricewaterhouseCoopers
and WestLB. The lectures were published in the first 2003
volume of Credit Institutions Review.
- Visit
of Mr Ernst Welteke, President of Bundesbank
During
his visit to Budapest at the invitation of the National
Bank of Hungary and the European Studies Institute, Mr Ernst
Welteke, President of Bundesbank, paid a visit to the Hungarian
Banking Association on June 18, 2002. The President of Bundesbank
met members of the Association's Board and representatives
of the Association's member banks.
In
his lecture Mr Welteke expressed appreciation for Hungary's
economic and political achievements whereby this country
is now regarded as the best among the pre-accession countries
to meet the EU requirements; however, he also pointed out
that there was still work to be done in meeting the convergence
criteria by increasing the intermediation role of the financial
sector and by further strengthening the operation of money
and capital markets. The President of Bundesbank also spoke
about the possible ways of reconciling budget needs with
central bank independence. He also addressed the issue of
how the EU integration and accession to the EMU would impact
the structure and profitability of the financial sector.
After
his lecture Mr Welteke answered questions by the participants.
- Visits
by international financial organisations
An
IMF delegation visited the Association at the beginning
of March, followed by an FATF delegation in May, to assess
activities related to the prevention of money laundering.
Visits included on-site discussions with banks, aimed at
assessing practical measures implemented in Hungary in the
fight against terrorism and money laundering.
Hungary
was removed from the list of non-cooperative countries in
June 2002. The decision was made by the FATF based
on on-site investigations and the new legislation and action
plans developed by the authorities. This, at the same time,
means that the relevant legislation and the development
projects and educational and training programs undertaken
will continue to be monitored through on and off-site inspections.
Action
plans were developed and implemented by the authorities
within the framework of a special inter-ministerial committee.
The Hungarian Banking Association undertook in its programme
to hold regular consultations, coordinate the developing
of best practices and organise regular sessions on the available
IT tools for bank managers responsible for the areas concerned.
- Conference
aimed at presenting the Polish Debtors Database
A
one-day conference aimed at presenting the recently set
up Polish Debtors’ Database was organised by the Association
in cooperation with GIRO Ltd. in August. The organisers’
objective was to familiarise professionals, involved in
the preparation of legal settings for the debtors’ positive
list database, with a similar system in operation before
submission of the draft law to Parliament in the autumn.
Professionals
from member banks, the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority
and the National Bank of Hungary received an overview of
the initial experiences, the legal framework and the expected
impacts of integration with the EU in this particular area.
- Activities
of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Working
Group
In
2002, the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Working
Committee, a sub-committee of the Association’s Bank
Security Committee, started developing a best practice model
to promote banks’ activities in this area. The Association
requested professionals from large and foreign-owned banks
(OTP, KH, CITIBANK, CIB, Raiffeisen Bank, MKB, BB) to be
involved in the practical work, to ensure, drawing on the
parent banks' experience, that the relevant standards are
in line with international practice and the relevant Hungarian
regulations. It was agreed with the competent authorities
(the Government Commissioner and the National Police Headquarters)
that the Best Practices to be issued will be reviewed with
them and, once finalised, will be deemed by them as governing.
The
Committee also considers it its task to ensure a continuous
exchange of experience between bank professionals on the
issue. Also, the Association was given the chance to submit
proposals to the FATF, the FBE and the Hungarian Financial
Supervisory for the forty FATF recommendations that constitute
the basis for the requirements currently in force. The task
of drafting the relevant proposal was given to the new Committee.
- Consultation
on issues related to general practitioner financing
At
the request of member banks, a round-table conference on
issues related to general practitioner financing was held
by the Association in February. The conference was attended
by representatives of the Ministry of Economic Affairs,
the Ministry of Healthcare, the Ministry of Finance, the
National Health Insurance Fund, the Hungarian Medical Chamber
and specialists from member banks. A number of practical
issues were answered, and banks were briefed on the main
directions of the proposed modifications to the relevant
Government Decree. Banks found the conference very useful
and asked the Association to continue to organise similar
consultations on any practical issues that may arise.
- Ad
Hoc Committee on Reporting
To
keep the reporting requirements of NBH and the Hungarian
Financial Supervisory Authority within reasonable limits,
a Reporting Ad Hoc Committee was set up based on
the relevant decision of the Association’s Board. Following
the Committee's first meeting in June, the Association initiated
a consultation with the National Bank of Hungary on problems
related to the use of title codes.
The
adjustment of reporting requirements in connection with
Hungary's EU accession is a major (although not unexpected)
task for banks. The Association attaches great importance
to representing banks' interests with special regard to
the continuously changing EU requirements, in order to ensure
that the changes required are implemented as smoothly as
possible.
- Money
and Capital Market Arbitration Court
The
new capital market law in force from 2002 has extended the
scope of competence of the Arbitration Court of the Budapest
Stock Exchange and the Budapest Commodity Exchange and allowed
for the setting up of a Money and Capital Market Arbitration
Court from July 1, 2002. Based on the decision of the Association's
General Meeting of April 3, 2002, the Association took part
in setting up the Court. The Association also decided to provide
financial contribution to the operation of the Arbitration
Court for a period of 3 years. In addition to the existing
stock and commodity exchange chambers, a new Credit Institutions
Chamber will be set up within the Court. Members of the new
chamber, the new arbitrators, were appointed by the Association's
General Meeting. The Arbitration Court's Statutes were signed
by three founders; thus, the Court can be considered formed.
At its June meeting, the Association's Board elected Dr Imre
Vörös and Dr János Bánáti to
members of the Presidium of the Court and dr Adrienne Kraudi
to President of the Court.
- Press
meeting
The
Association’s Board gave a brief summary of the Association’s
assessment of economic and financial processes in the first
half of 2002. The Secretary General pointed out that economic
growth in the first half of the year could not be considered
low in the face of a weak international economy; however,
the economy failed to return to an investment and export-driven
path and growth mainly resulted from an expansion of consumption.
The deficit of general government was the highest in 10
years. Macro-economic tensions were further aggravated by
monetary policy not only not signalling the need for a tightened
fiscal policy (which has been of an expansive character
for nearly three years) but rather supporting – up until
May – a demand-stimulating economic policy which manifested
in a deterioration of competitiveness. The central bank
attempted to rein in inflation by a significant real appreciation
of the Hungarian currency, which can be maintained in the
short-term but may have adverse consequences in the long-term.
The Secretary General expressed hope that fiscal and monetary
policy-makers will soon find a common way to set the economy
on an investment and export-driven path again.
An
important element in the Association’s comments on the proposed
comprehensive amendment to financial laws was the proposal
for setting up a Private Debtors Positive List Database.
Given that this proposal raised a number of data protection
issues, a consultation was initiated with the Data Protection
Ombudsman. The Ombudsman presented a negative opinion in
writing.
Journalists
asked several questions about the proposed Private Debtors
Positive List Database and inquired on the expected position
of banks on the issue. Questions were answered by Mr.Tamás
Erdei, President of the Hungarian Banking Association.
- Home
page
The
Association is continuously publishing new information on
its home page, renewed in 2002. From this web side, banks,
inter alia, can obtain information on conferences and training
opportunities abroad. Publications, quarterly and annual reports
and opinions of the Association on specific issues are also
made public on the home page.
The
Association’s home page is regarded by banks as a useful source
providing up-to-date information on important conferences,
workshops and training courses.
II.
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
- Act
LXIV of 2002 on Amendments to Certain Financial Acts
The
draft of a comprehensive amendment to the Credit Institutions
Act and the Securities Act was passed by Parliament on December
23, 2002. The amendment was aimed at abolishing formerly necessary
but now superfluous legal restrictions, law harmonisation
with the EU and, in respect of the Credit Institutions Act,
meeting a regulatory obligation resulting from a ruling by
the Constitutional Court.
Part
of the amendments entered into force as of January 1, 2003,
some rules will become effective on Hungary’s accession to
the European Union.
1.1
Amendment to the Act on Credit Institutions and Financial
Enterprises (Act CXII of 1996)
The
amended Act contains significant changes in respect of a number
of issues. The following are the most important changes:
The
regulation on consolidated supervision has changed significantly.
The amendment to the regulation on the consolidated supervision
of businesses in ownership relationship or other controlling
relationship is aimed at ensuring a transparent and controllable
risk management between associate enterprises.
Restrictions
on the acquisition of ownership in credit institutions have
been abolished. Currently, the ownership share of a single
owner in a credit institution’s subscribed capital – with
the exception of acquisition of ownership by other credit
institutions, financial enterprises or investment companies
– may not exceed 15%. With the implementation of a group level
supervision, this restriction will become irrelevant. With
reference to international regulations and practice, the higher
education requirement for senior bank officers has been abolished;
the new requirement is ten years experience at a similar institution.
The
requirements for the foundation of co-operative credit institutions
have been tightened, existing credit institutions have been
given an interim deadline to comply with the new requirements.
The
provision on mandatory bi-annual on-site inspections has been
replaced by mandatory bi-annual comprehensive supervisory
inspections. The provisions on consumer protection have been
expanded, the scope of competence of reconciliatory bodies
of the Consumer Protection Supervisory Authority has been
extended to financial services, as well.
The
Association entered the drafting process in June, when the
Ministry of Finance asked professional interest representation
organisations to provide their proposals for amendments to
the Act.
Based
on banks’ proposals, a detailed concept document, including
specific wording proposals was compiled and submitted to the
Ministry. Proposals were submitted concerning the scope of
activities of credit institutions to include electronic signature
services. We recommended that provisions on outsourcing be
annulled, given that the Ministry has failed to issue the
relevant implementation decree, and therefore, there was a
general legal uncertainty over the types of activities that
can be outsourced. We submitted a proposal for making the
regulations on banking secrecy more specific in order to simplify
the execution procedure of shared accounts and to allow the
developing of positive list credit reference services. We
also proposed for debtors' (or their owners’) shares listed
on the stock exchange to be allowed to be accepted as collateral.
Further, we proposed that short-term interbank deposits should
not considered as a risk exposure.
Regarding
the imposition of supervisory fines we proposed setting a
100-day maximum limit on default. Also, we submitted proposals
in relations to advertisements, electronic contracts, the
publication of business rules and certain definitions of the
Act.
1.2
Amendment to the Capital Market Act
In
addition to amendments to the Credit Institutions Act, Act
LXIV of 2002 also includes amendments to the Capital Market
Act (Act XX of 2001), the Act on Building Societies (Act
CXIII of 2001), the Act on Insurance Institutions and Insurance
Activities (Act CXVI of 1995) and the Act on Consumer Protection
(Act CLV of 1997).
At
the request of the Ministry of Finance, in July 2002 the
Association compiled a summary of banks’ proposals for amendments
to the Capital Market Act. As a general note we pointed
out the fact that transactions performed between investment
service providers were not regulated separately; also, we
emphasised that in our opinion, it is the client who should
be protected from potential risks, given that the investment
service providers have their own risk management procedures.
Accordingly,
we proposed that transactions performed by using investment
instruments between two credit institutions or between a
credit institution and a financial enterprise or between
a credit institution and the National Bank of Hungary as
well as sale and purchase and swap transactions performed
by credit institutions by using their own issued bonds be
excluded from the definition of services.
Comments
were also submitted in relation to the conversion of print
securities into dematerialised securities, the offering
of collective investment securities through continuous issue,
rules on company signature, client risk rating, mandatory
information, keeping the share book, securities lending,
portfolio transfer, conflict of interest on the stock exchange,
payment of supervisory authority fees and reporting requirements.
The
first version of the draft amendment was received from the
Ministry of Finance for review in September. In the summary
compiled based on our member banks’ comments we submitted
proposals in relation to the rules for converting print
securities into dematerialised securities, the definition
of continuous issue, narrowing the scope of extraordinary
information and retaining existing professional qualification
requirements. We also proposed having a more flexible regulation
on outsourcing.
We
submitted proposals for complementing the provisions on
the Money and Capital Market Arbitration Court. We also
proposed setting a maximum limit on turnover-related supervisory
fees. Our summarised proposal was copied to member banks.
Upon
the Association’s proposal, amendments were incorporated
to Section 337 on the scope of activities of organisations
performing clearing house services and Section 202 on insider
trading
The
Act has complemented the provisions taking effect on Hungary’s
accession to the EU and has made them more specific.
1.3
Amendment to the Act on Building Societies
Pursuant
to the amendment to the Act on Building Societies, state support
provided for preliminary home savings contracts has been doubled,
to HUF 72,000. The amendment, however, does not affect existing
contracts. The extent of state support for housing co-operatives
and condominiums will increase in a differentiated way, depending
on the size of the building.
In
the amendment to the Act on Consumer Protection, the authorisation
of the Supervisory Authority to file a suit in public interest
appears as a new instrument to enforce investor claims, when
the illegal activity of the service provider affects a wide
range of consumers or causes a significant disadvantage.
1.4
Private Debtors’ Positive List Database
At
the request of the National Bank of Hungary and member banks,
the Association has assumed the task of drafting the provisions
for a Private Debtors Positive List Database for the proposed
amendment to the Credit Institutions Act to be enacted in
the autumn.
While
clients in default are recorded in the current negative list
database, the proposed positive list would contain all loan
debts of a client. The new database would enable potential
creditors to check on clients’ creditworthiness more thoroughly.
With rapidly increasing household borrowings, it is in the
best interest of the central bank as well as of commercial
banks to set up the proposed database as soon as possible.
The new database would provide more accurate information on
the borrowing potential of households.
Two
working groups were set up to manage the drafting work: a
the technical working group, to define the scope of information
to be managed in the database and a legal working group, to
draft the legislation and develop the data protection aspects.
After two months of intensive work, the draft law was completed
at the beginning of September, with the following main points:
- All
financial institutions engaged in lending should join the
system on a mandatory basis. The client's agreement will
not be required for sending its data into the database.
- The
proposal envisaged the database to be operational from 2004
(this would not be specified as a requirement in the Act,
but the system owner would like to ensure that the technical
documentation required for implementation is made available
to banks as soon as possible).
- Rather
than setting up a new system, the database would be implemented
within the framework of the current corporate register by
adding a positive list component to the existing private
debtors negative list database.
- Client
identification and registration would be easier if the use
of "personal numbers" was allowed, to replace
the current name and address data.
- Although
most of those involved in the drafting process agreed that
existing loans should also be included in the database,
some serious legal concerns were raised in relation to the
retrospective effect of the regulation; accordingly, an
alternative proposal for entry into force was included in
the draft.
- A separate
section was included to address client data protection issues.
Following
a detailed discussion with member banks and review by the
Association’s Board, the draft law was submitted to the Ministry
of Finance. Given that the regulation will affect the wider
public, the Association also solicited the opinion of the
Data Protection Ombudsman.
The
conclusion of the consultation with the Data Protection Ombudsman
was that the draft law should be revised due to constitutional
queries; given the short time, this could be done within the
framework of another planned amendment to the Credit Institutions
Act in 2003.
- Common
project for developing electronic signature certificates
for telebanking
The
Association's working committee responsible for developing
a program to promote telebanking with the use of electronic
signatures closed the first, information technology, phase
of its work at the beginning of 2002. Banks involved in the
working committee decided to ask for the opinion of the Association's
Board on the next phases in the process (selecting the contractor
to implement the project, the role GIRO would play in the
next phases and certain legal issues to be clarified).
The
Board decided that in addition to GIRO, other potential service
providers should also be contacted and asked about their scope
and terms and conditions of services.
Based
on this decision, Banks on the committee decided to set up
a new working group to draft an invitation for bids, including
all the relevant IT, business and legal requirements.
2.1
Activities of the Working Group on
Electronic Signatures
After
identifying the IT requirements, the working group started
working on the related business and legal issues. From business
points of view the group focused on identifying client authorisations
to be associated with the common certificate. On the legal
side, the group looked at the practicability of certification
within the prevailing legal framework; since legal experts
involved in the working group raised some serious queries
concerning this issue, the Association assigned a law office
specialising in IT laws to clarify the questions raised.
The
summary report was reviewed at a special meeting of the working
group. The followings were concluded:
- Pursuant
to the Act on Electronic Signatures, certification services
may be provided by separate organisations. In other words,
credit institutions may provide partial services on behalf
of the licensed service provider.
- Experts
were divided with regard to the law office's opinion that
the exchange of client data between banks based on proper
authorisations should not be a problem. (Some banks challenged
this statement based on the opinion of the Data Protection
Ombudsman),
- The
working group was of the opinion that the implementation
of the project would require amendments to the Credit Institutions
Act and the Money Laundering Act. The group requested the
Association's assistance in this respect.
- No
final position was reached on the question whether the fact
that all banks would assign the same certification service
provider to issue the required certificates would violate
the competition law.
2.2
Status
of the common electronic signature certificate
By
elaborating the standard containing the requirements of banks,
the working group has completed its work. The result of this
work, however, has not been made public for the banks, as
an essential element – the inter-bank acceptability of the
common certificate – could not be settled from the legal side
in a reassuring manner.
An
important element of making the standard functioning is that,
clients with a common bank certificate could establish from
their computers a business relationship with any domestic
bank by using their electronic signature. However, the Act
on the Prevention and Impeding of Money Laundering stipulates
a client-identification procedure according to which the client
must appear in person and present his/her ID documents at
the bank.
Drafting
of the proposed law amendment was assisted a law office specialising
in IT-technology issues. After a review by bank experts, the
proposal was submitted to the Ministry of Finance and the
Government Commissioner on Money Laundering. Pursuant to the
proposal, the financial institution would not be obliged to
apply the strict provisions of the Money Laundering Act when
checking on a new client identifying himself electronically
by using the common bank certificate, but could rely on the
identification of the financial institution that has issued
the certificate. For this purpose, the proposal suggests introducing
the notion of "primary identification". This would
of course require the client’s consent and the credit institution
to obtain client’s data and ID documents from the bank performing
the primary identification.
In
addition to our wording proposal, we have attached a substantial
justification section in which international practice was
also outlined in detail. According to this, the initiative
of the Banking Association does not contradict the relevant
EU directive and gives due consideration to the Guide issued
by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision as well as
the relevant Recommendation of the Financial Action Task Force
(FATF) of the OECD.
According
to preliminary information obtained from the Ministry of Finance
and the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority, these two
authorities in principle agree with the Association’s proposal.
However, in view of the fact that Hungary was just recently
deleted from the black list of the FATF, for the time being,
any proposal resulting in loosening the rules would be received
with reservations.
- Measures
for the prevention and impeding of money laundering
According
to some opinions, current regulations on money laundering
contain a number of elements that cannot be to implement
in practice. The competent regulatory and supervisory authorities
have realised the reality of the issues we have raised and
the Ministry of Finance has expressed its willingness to
address the issues in question, pointing out, however, that
given that the draft law has already been presented to Parliament,
any modification to it could only be effected through a
motion by a Member of Parliament.
With
the cooperation of members of the committee and with the
support of the Ministry of Finance, our most important proposals
were presented to Parliament in the form of MP motions.
The following proposals were submitted:
-
The scope of persons subject to identification should be
narrowed. Contracts between organisations licensed and thus,
adequately controlled, by the Hungarian Financial Supervisory
Authority are exempt from the obligation of identification.
Data of such organisations are available for the investigation
authority in databases kept by authorities pursuant to other
laws and regulations.
-
Service providers suspending transactions for reasons specified
in the Act should not be held accountable for such action.
However, the exclusion of liability would only apply if
the service provider has followed the procedure specified
by the Act. Thus, service providers could be relieved from
serious liability and financial consequences of suspending
transactions.
-
A proposal was drafted to specify those instances where
it would be the service provider’s responsibility to perform
identification and those where it would be the client’s
to provide the data required.
-
A proposal was submitted for a deadline in respect of transactions
requiring identification. Accordingly, service providers
would be allowed, until the end of December 2003, to perform
transaction orders from clients with whom the service provider
has had business relations prior to the enactment of the
Act and the client’s identification data are not fully available
and the client has not appeared for the purpose of identification
despite a respective written notice by the service provider.
Effective from January 1, 2004, any order from a client
whose identification data were not obtainable during this
interim period should be rejected.
- Bank
security
The
Mór bank robbery, which claimed 8 fatalities,
put bank security in the forefront of public opinion and
focused attention on bank security issues, including regulations,
infrastructure, responsibility, etc.
To
ensure common action by the profession, the Bank Security
Committee held a special meeting to determine the measures
required. A meeting was also invited by the Ministry of
Finance and the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority
to provide a quick regulatory response.
From
early summer to the end of September 2002 the Association
explained the banking sector’s position at all review forums
of the Ministry of Finance. An important achievement was
that the regulation would not entail any substantial extra
costs for banks. As a result of the reviews, a manageable
bank security regulation draft was complied.
However,
certain concessions made due to the limited cost-bearing
capacity of savings co-operatives and the Hungarian Post
Office were so strongly opposed by representatives of the
Interior Ministry attending the review that finally, in
the absence of agreement and despite the September deadline,
the last version of the draft decree was not submitted to
the Government.
The
Bank Security Committee discussed the following issues:
-
Concept for cooperation in receiving and processing signals
coming from security installations of bank branches and
related actions by the police. Under the concept, the National
Police Headquarters (ORFK) and organisations of the Defence
Ministry, operating on a contracting basis, presented the
Association a proposal for a faster and more efficient alarm
system. The Committee requested the National Police Headquarters
to have further consultations on the details of cooperation
and the costs involved.
-
Presentation by Kereskedelmi és Hitelbank Rt on the
detecting bank frauds by electronic means. The method presented
is suitable for preventing frauds and other account or payment-related
internal crimes committed by bank employees. According to
K&H Bank’s Compliance Officer, practical experience
shows that the method is also suitable for detecting suspicious
money movements that may be related to money laundering.
- Reporting
requirements
Banks’
activities in 2002 were significantly affected by the modified
reporting requirements of the Hungarian Financial Supervisory
Authority and the National Bank of Hungary and by the process
of coordination of banks’ opinions regarding the new requirements.
The Supervisory Authority made preparations for the implementation
of a consolidated reporting system and introduced certain
changes to the reporting requirements for banks providing
investment services.
The
Association’s Board decided to set up a technical committee
on reporting to assist banks in preparing themselves
for the new reporting requirements and in representing banks'
opinion on the proposed changes.
The
Association held a meeting to resolve issues related to reporting
new bank account numbers introduced for banking technology
reasons to the Tax and Financial Control Administration
(APEH). The banks’ problem was that while previously
all bank account numbers had to be reported to one authority
(the Registration Court), based on a law amendment enacted
in 2001 the Tax Office also indicated its requirement to have
information on the new bank account numbers (special numbers
introduced by the banks within their own scope of competence).
The
meeting was attended by representatives from the Tax and Financial
Control Administration, banks, the Ministry of Finance, the
Justice Ministry, the National Bank of Hungary and the IT
company managing Registration Court reporting. The IT company
proposed that the data requested by APEH be sent together
with the Registration Court reports, in the same format, and
the IT company will then select the required information and
send it to the Tax Office.
The
president of the Tax and Financial Control Administration
requested in a letter the Association’s assistance to resolve
problems encountered in the use of tax identification numbers
when extending credit, namely: several banks rejected
loan applications in cases where the client’s birth date and
the date of birth retrieved from the tax identification number
differed. In particular, the tax authority objected to the
practice that such tax identification numbers, after having
been confirmed by an official certificate issued by the tax
authority specifically for this purpose were still not accepted
by some credit institutions.
The
Association informed member banks on the letter of the tax
authority and requested their opinion. The issue was analysed
with experts of the affected banks. During this analysis it
became clear that incorrect tax identifiers may be generated
by fault of the clients as well as by that of APEH (e.g. wrong
data entry), but this number has been probably in use for
years for various other official proceedings, so for tax returns
as well. A correction of erroneous tax identifiers would not
be practicable, as this would lead to the need to revise all
affairs handled based on these numbers. Ultimately bank experts
considered it acceptable to recognise tax identifiers that
in legal terms are "faulty" but are confirmed by
an APEH certificate.
The
National Bank of Hungary held a consultation for banks on
the modification of interest statistics reporting requirements
in 2002. At the discussion, the issue of the applicability
of the Indicator of Total Charges on Credit (THM) to certain
banking products was raised again. Citing international examples,
the NBH did not agree with the view that the reporting requirement
was unwarranted. However, some banks disagreed with this.
As no solution was reached at the meeting, the Association
suggested having a second consultation, in a more limited
circle.
The
second consultation brought tangible results:
- It
was agreed that the Indicator of Total Charges on Credit
will not be applied to overdraft facilities or credit cards
functioning as overdraft,
- For
corporate loans, the Indicator will be only apply to SME
loans not related to the borrower's business (in NBH's interpretation:
loans basically taken for private purposes).
- For
mortgage loans, the NBH will consider the Association's
proposal for banks to develop an economically correct and
easily verifiable estimating method instead of providing
a mandatory computation method which would be hard to implement,
- it
was agreed that a separate consultation will be held on
two reporting philosophy questions, namely: how international
reporting requirements can be incorporated in the central
bank reporting requirements and what indicators the authorities
may require from reporting organisations.
The
NBH reporting requirements for 2002 were duly modified in
accordance with the above agreements.
- Motion
to the Constitutional Court on Act CXVI on the National
Land Fund and Act CXVII amending Act LV of 1994 on Arable
Land
A
report prepared based on consultations with member banks
involved in agricultural lending was presented to the Association's
Board on the expected adverse impacts of the above laws.
Constitutional queries raised during these consultations
were also confirmed by legal counsels from member banks.
Based
on a resolution adopted on January 23, 2002, the Board requested
prominent legal experts in constitutional and agricultural
laws to investigate the constitutional queries raised and
to draft a relevant motion to the Constitutional Court.
After review by the Association's Board, the motion was
submitted to the Constitutional Court. The motion asked
for abolishing certain provisions of the Act on the National
Land Fund and Act CXVII of 2001 amending the Act on Arable
Land; further, it requested the Court to annul Government
Decree No. 16/2002 (II 18) on detailed rules for excising
pre-emption and pre-emptive leasing rights related to arable
land, the provision of Government Decree No. 17/2002./II.8./
on detailed rules for the registration and management of
assets of the National Land Fund and Government Resolution
No. 1010/2002./II.1./ on the Principles of Land Property
Policy.
The
provisions requested to be annulled violate several provisions
of the Constitution, make agricultural lending difficult
and risky and reduce the value of arable land as collateral.
Based on these latter arguments, agricultural interest representation
organisations and the Association filed independent motions
with the Constitutional Court.
- Other
professional issues
In
addition to the above activities, the Association coordinated
reviews of the new Insolvency Act and the concept
of the new Civil Code, this latter intended to
create the legal conditions for a market economy with social
elements.The concept is based on the principles of private
property, private autonomy, the liberty of contract and the
freedom of enterprise. The new Civil Code will be extended
in scope and will contain regulations on family rights and
general regulations on employment contracts and the use of
intellectual property. The concept is primarily aimed at creating
the legal framework and conditions for pecuniary transactions
between equal parties.
In
their comments, banks basically agreed with the concept and
their observations were mostly focused on banking laws not
addressed in depth in the concept, including banking relations,
securities laws and securities relations.
Banks
questioned the idea of providing employment contract regulations
under the Civil Code. Further, they proposed that regulations
on co-operatives be added to the Code, especially if business
organisations were to be covered by the law. Most comments
were related to contract law, proposals were submitted in
relation to collateral obligations guaranteeing the contract,
the repayment of financial debts, certain types of contract
and the termination of contracts. The Association also addressed
the proposed Ministry of Finance Decree to regulate administrative
activities eligible for outsourcing; key issues raised in
this area included the definition of outsourcing, as the basic
category of the regulation; issues related to the protection
of banking secrecy, outsourcing of activities to entities
outside Hungary, allowing an interim period, etc.
The
Association reviewed issues related to the out of court
sale of pledges, as a new regulatory tool in hypothecary
law. In respect of claims secured by lien, credit institutions
now fall under the same regulations as those applied to secured
lenders. In addition, auctioneers, insolvency practitioners
and independent bailiffs may also be commissioned to sell
pledges. Banks submitted several comments on the draft, mainly
aimed at balancing the advantageous position of the mortgagor
and allowing the mortgagee to initiate sanctions in the event
of default by the mortgagor.
Following
a review with the involvement of the Hungarian Banking Association,
the Chamber of Hungarian Notaries, the Chamber of Bailiffs,
the Hungarian Association of Insolvency Practitioners and
the competent Ministries, the Ministry of Justice revised
the draft; a number of our comments were accepted.
The
Association of Hungarian Insurance Companies and the Hungarian
Banking Association wish to conclude an agreement for managing
insurance policies serving as collateral for home loans by
using uniform printed forms. The elaboration of details of
a cooperation to provide more efficient services to common
clients of banks and insurance companies have commenced. Preparations
have been sped up due to the need to acquire the consent of
the Competition Authority.
III.
LOAN SCHEMES
1.
Agricultural
evolution loans
The
evolution loan scheme was introduced for businesses in the
agricultural sector by a Government Decree in the fall of
1999. Under this scheme, private entrepreneurs and companies
in the agricultural sector were invited to submit applications
to the Ministry of Agriculture for the government to assume
part of their long-term loan instalments as a government support.
In their applications the applicants had to undertake commitments
for technology development, restructuring and improved management.
The
agricultural evolution loan scheme commenced in 2002 and will
be concluded in 2003. 2,800 applications were accepted. Applicants’
self-assessment reports were evaluated based on their commitments
for 2001. The deadline for the submission of self-assessment
reports was May 31. Banks had to complete the evaluations
and send their opinions to the Ministry by June 30, 2002.
As
of the end of September, two thirds of the reports were reviewed
by the technical appraisal committee at the Ministry of Agriculture.
Only a small percentage of the reports was rejected.
The
review of self-assessment reports was due to be completed
by the end of October. Accordingly, it is expected that loan
instalments to a value of approx. HUF 13 billion, due in 2002,
will be settled through the utilisation of government support.
2.
Settlement of short-term agricultural loan debts
2.
1. Legal
framework
On
passing the Act on the Closing Account for the year 2001 the
Hungarian Parliament approved a state support of HUF 60 billion
for agricultural entrepreneurs to help them repay their short-term
loans. Out of the HUF 60 billion allocation, HUF 45 billion
was allocated for the general settlement of short-term agricultural
loan debts and HUF 15 billion for agricultural businesses
for mitigating damages caused by drought and the Danube flooding.
The relevant implementation decree was approved by the Government
on October 17 and then modified on November 16.
To
promote implementation, the Ministry of Agriculture issued
a Guide for practical purposes.
2.
2. Preparations
by banks
In
accordance with the resolution of the Board, the Association
set up a working group with the involvement of all interested
banks, to discuss the tasks and actions required. About 200
questions, comments and proposals were submitted by the banks
in relation to the draft decree.
The
government decree and its amendment failed to clarify numerous,
from the aspect of implementation, important, practical questions.
Therefore, a Guide was issued by the Ministry of Agriculture.
Banks made several proposals in relation to the guide. These
were primarily aimed at clarifying the tasks for banks and
the relationship between the client and the banks during debt
settlement.
2.
3. Implementation
The
first phase of implementation ended on November 29. By
that date agricultural entrepreneurs (applicants) had to announce
their request for state subsidy to the County Offices of the
Ministry of Agriculture. For this, the applicant had to obtain
data from the banks with whom he had short-term loans with
interest subsidy standing on May 31 2000/2001/2002 or term
deposits fixed for more than one month, or debt securities
on his securities account or bank deposits and securities
deposited in connection with interest-subsidised loans.
Pursuant
to the government decree, the applicant had to simultaneously
conclude an agreement with the bank(s) about how and for the
repayment of which loans he would use the state subsidy. The
amendment of the government decree provides for the following
order of priority:
- loans
with government guarantee with a maturity under one year,
- other
loans with government guarantee with a maturity under
one year,
- loans
with government guarantee with a maturity over one year,
- other
loans with a maturity over one year.
The
repayment subsidy could exclusively be used for interest-subsidised
loans funded from the budget chapter of the Ministry of Agriculture.
In case of loans with several banks, the repayment was to
be split between banks proportionally.
Based
on the agreement with the tax authority, the client could
open a technical account at his bank (at one bank only, even
where several credit institutions involved) and ask for the
support to be disbursed to this account.
Due
to the inexactness of the relevant government decrees and
with most clients being unprepared, combined with a very short
deadline, bank clerks had a very difficult task to resolve.
Therefore, the Association emphasised that banks would provide
data at the client’s request from their records, but composing
the application was the task and responsibility of the applicant.
The
second phase of implementation ended on December 31. Applications
received until November 29 by County Offices of the Ministry
of Agriculture were summarised by the Ministry. Based on this
and pursuant to its authorisation under the relevant government
decree, the Ministry on December 3 published the adjustment
rates by which the amount of subsidy applied for had to be
reduced to 87.5%.
Accordingly,
the applicants finalised the amount of state subsidy requested
and submitted their applications to the tax authority between
December 6 and 13. The tax authority disbursed the state subsidy
without any check up to the bank account specified by the
applicant.
Applicants
then could dispose of the loan instalments in accordance with
the relevant agreements. To ensure smooth implementation,
we requested to provide in the Guide that state subsidy disbursements
should be transferred to the client’s account still in 2002
and the applicant should dispose, until December 22, of the
state subsidy to be transferred to the banks as loan repayment.
2.
4. Results of the scheme
Combined
with integrators, nearly 50 thousand applications for support
to a total value of HUF 68.5 billion were submitted to the
tax authority. (According to the Ministry of Agriculture,
integrated applicants represent another 50 thousand participants).
The amount disbursed was HUF 59.9 billion, 87.5 % of the total
amount applied for.
Despite
the extremely short timeframe, the scheme was successfully
accomplished without any major disturbances. This was largely
contributed to by the continued active and client-centred
attitude of the banks.
3.
Intervention purchases
of wheat and corn
The
Ministry of Agriculture announced intervention purchases,
initially for wheat and subsequently, for corn. The produce
had to be stored in a public warehouse. The Ministry requested
banks to extend loans to entrepreneurs against warehouse receipt
as collateral.
The
Ministry of Agriculture signed an agreement with the banks
interested, containing the loan conditions and guarantees
for repayment of the loan. The Association coordinated the
banks’ views and proposals with the Ministry. 13 banks announced
their interest and signed the agreement.
4. Student
loans
An
informal consultation on the transformation of the student
loan scheme was held by the Ministry of Finance with the involvement
of banks on July 18, 2002. At the consultation, the Ministry
announced its intention to allow other banks to be involved
in the disbursement of the loan scheme, in addition to Postbank;
in addition, the Ministry was studying the option of fundamentally
revising the student loan scheme by placing it on a commercial
basis; the Ministry was also investigating the possibility
of replacing the current liabilities-side government guarantees
by asset-side guarantees, to allow banks to participate in
the lending scheme with their own resources.
Since
no written proposal had been presented, banks present at the
consultation did not take position on the issue; nevertheless,
they expressed their interest in the scheme. Following the
meeting, a brief description of the concept was compiled by
the Ministry. The document was forwarded to the banks interested.
The
concept outlined the future transformation of the student
loan scheme (not affecting the 2002/2003 school-year). According
to the concept, while the loan conditions would remain unchanged,
banks would provide student loans from their own resources
and the related government guarantee would be 100% attached
to the loan. Upon redemption of the government guarantee,
the debt would be collectible under the rules applied to the
collection of tax liabilities. The maximum interest on the
loan would be pegged to a reference yield on government securities.
Instalments would be determined based on the debtor’s previous
year’s income, certified by the Tax Office. The Student Loan
Centre would operate with a small staff under the supervision
of the Ministry of Finance as an organisation performing administrative
functions.
Banks
emphasised their intention to be involved in student loan
account management as soon as possible. In relation to the
transformation of the loan scheme, banks pointed out that
involvement in the scheme would require adequate preparations
and IT system modifications. They expressed their opinion
that the type of surety associated with the loans was problematic:
an absolute guarantee would make the facility more manageable.
Banks’ comments were forwarded to the Ministry.
Government
decided that the conditions should be ensured for student
loans to be disbursable at any commercial bank in Hungary.
The decision is contained in Government Resolution No. 1169/2002/X.10./Korm.
on additional tasks related to improving the conditions for
developing competitive skills. Pursuant to the Resolution,
conditions for the implementation of the Resolution were due
to be developed by December 1, 2001.
5.
Abolition of the liquidation loan facility
The
liquidation loan facility created in 1994 was abolished by
Government Decree 310/2002 (XII. 28.). The essence of loan
facility was that an interest subsidy could be applied for
loans granted for purchasing assets of companies under liquidation.
The Association was involved in developing this facility as,
with the help of interest subsidies, clients became more creditworthy
and businesses under liquidation gained access to additional
resources, so there was a hope for stranded bank receivables
to be – at least partially – recovered. The system was advantageous
for the national economy as well as helped reinstall productive
assets of businesses under liquidation and promoted new small
and medium-sized enterprises.
During
its 9 years of existence the loan facility was utilised by
more than 1000 enterprises, the amount of interest subsidies
disbursed was HUF 3.4 billion and banks made available liquidation
loans to a value of HUF 20 billion. Almost all credit institutions
engaged in the SME sector joined the liquidation loan scheme.
According
to the review analysing the facility, the loan scheme affected
all sectors of the economy and helped increase employment
nationwide. Although the system was aimed at purchasing assets,
the most successful transactions were those linked to supporting
the purchase of plants under liquidation but still in operation
(thus helping their prospective operation).
The
Banking Association not only participated in shaping and further
developing the facility but also took an active part in the
work of the Inter-Ministerial Committee preparing the decision.
During this activity – working closely with the banks - it
put forward its arguments on numerous disputed issues, aiming
at promoting the interests of banks and their clients.
The
abolition of the facility was due to the fact that with the
diminishing number of liquidations the number of cases brought
to the Committee decreased as well, and the Ministry of Finance,
the authority responsible for the issue, for plausible economic
reasons decided not to allocate more funds for this purpose
in the budget for the year 2003.
- INTERNATIONAL
COOPERATION
1. European
Banking Federation
As
in previous years, the Associations representatives attended
meetings of the committees and working groups of the European
Banking Federation. This report gives an account of the most
important issues addressed. Other specific issues are detailed
in our quarterly reports.
1.1
Banking Supervision Committee
Capital
Accord Basel II
In
2002 the FBE continued to give special attention to the new
Basel Capital Accord. While steps in the process of developing
the new accord were slightly behind schedule, the contents
of the proposed accord improved on a number of issues. Here
are the most important developments:
Joined
by the Canadian and Japanese and U.S. Banking Associations,
the FBE wrote a letter to the Secretary General of the Basel
Committee in which they drew attention to the fact that the
Basel proposal for applying the IRB approach for retail exposures
was inconsistent with banks’ risk management practices and
requested that the proposal be modified.
Results
of the Quantitative Impact Study QIS 2.5 were disclosed in
July. Due to the relatively narrow circle of banks involved
in the survey, the results cannot be considered as representative.
During
its meeting of July 10, 2002, the Basel Committee reached
agreement on a number of important issues related to the new
Basel Capital Accord. The agreement brought a breakthrough
in the treatment of SME’s, a key political issue in the EU.
Agreement was also reached on a more favourable treatment
of certain retail exposures (such as credit cards). The gap
between capital requirements under the foundation and advanced
IRB approaches was narrowed. The IRB capital requirement for
credit risk and operational risk together may not fall below
90% of the capital requirement under the current Accord in
the first year following implementation and 80% in the second
year. To reduce procyclicality, banks adopting an IRB approach
will be required to perform a meaningfully conservative credit
risk stress test under Pillar Two to ensure that they hold
sufficient buffer capital.
The
FBE maintains its reservations concerning the treatment of
the SME sector; maturities, specialised lending, the third
retail risk curve, the measurement of operational risk, the
introduction of floor capital and the mandatory application
of stress tests.
The
working paper titled "Revised Sound Practices for the
Management and Supervision of Operational Risk" was published
for discussion in June too. The FBE welcomed the modifications,
with special regard to the adoption of the proposals it had
made; however, it maintained its disagreement to the treatment
of this portfolio element in the way proposed by the Committee.
The
Third Quantitative Impact Survey (QIS 3) commenced in October.
The required data had been collected by December 20, 2002.
Results of this survey may have a significant impact on the
contents and calibration of the third Consultative Package
(CP3).
The
FBE sent the Basel Committee its comments on the QIS3Technical
Guidance . In these comments the FBE
- supported
the convergence of supervisory practices, the objective
of ensuring the transparency of practices referred to national
discretion and the removal of national discretions over
time;
- emphasised
that banks should have an incentive to move towards the
most risk-sensitive approaches, and thus, strengthen their
risk management capabilities.
- proposed
consultation on the requirements of the supervisory review
process under Pillar 2 prior to publication of CP3 in May
2003.
The
Basel Committee gives special attention to Pillar 3 (Market
Discipline) to ensure that investors can obtain sufficient
information that will help them understand a bank’s risk profile,
without imposing unnecessary disclosure requirements on the
banks.
Representatives
of the FBE met in November with the working group of the Basel
Committee responsible for developing the disclosure requirements
(Transparency Working Group). At the meeting it was agreed
that Pillar 3 should be consistent with the updated IAS standards.
(Unfortunately the relevant new standards will only be completed
by the end of 2003 and so they do not provide real support
for developing Pillar 3). Following the meeting the TWG sent
the FBE the new working paper on Pillar 3 enabling it to review
it before finalisation of CP3. During the revision of Pillar
3 – in the course of which the TWG worked closely with the
standard-setters - modifications to Pillar 1 as well as a
part of the comments made by the banking sector were taken
into account.
According
to current plans the timetable for introducing the new capital
accord is as follows: The 3rd Consultative Package
will be published in May 2003 to be reviewed by the industry
by end July. The final new Basel Capital Accord will be published
in October 2003. The proposal will be adopted by the European
Commission as a new capital adequacy directive in March 2004,
to be then be approved by the European Parliament in September
2005. This will be followed by adoption by member states.
From January 2006, the new capital requirements may be applied
simultaneously with the 1988 capital accord until December
31, 2006, which is the final date for the introduction of
the new capital requirements.
The
Third Capital Adequacy Directive (CAD3)
From
the end of 2002, special attention has been given to the introduction
of the new Basel Capital Accord in the EU. The European Commission
published its working paper on the new EU capital adequacy
framework in November. This working paper, not the full directive
yet, and has two parts: the first part containing the fundamental
principles and rules formulated in the various sections of
the directive and the second part (an appendix), providing
the detailed rules for application.
The
FBE has set up a working group to develop a common position
on the proposed directive. The working group held two meetings
in 2002. The task of the group is to identify the points where
CAD3 differs from Basel II and to indicate those areas where
the two regulations should differ. Based on the findings of
the working group, the FBE will develop a common position
on CAD3. Representatives of the FBE attended the meeting held
within the framework of structured dialogue between the European
Commission and representatives of the industry.
Financial
stability, supervision, and regulation
The
Economic and Financial Committee of the European Union (EFC)
prepared a report on issues related to financial regulation,
supervision and stability in July. The report proposes to
extend the four-level securities market decision making process
developed by the Lámfalussy Committee to the entire
financial sector. To recognise sectoral specificities, three
sector committees, for banking, insurance and securities,
would be set up on levels 2 and 3. On the second level, a
fourth committee would also be set up to address the issue
of special rules for financial conglomerates.
The
EBF has set up an ad hoc working group to form an opinion
on the proposals made in the EFC report. In its response letter
the FBE emphasised the importance of consultations with the
industry and transparency of the legislation process on all
levels. The new system of supervision and regulation should
be adequately structured in size and should be able to keep
pace with the rapid development of financial markets. The
FBE supported the proposal for transforming FSPG into a group
with the task to address inter-sectoral issues (banking, insurance
and investment) and to develop the financial sector’s medium
and long-term strategies. The FBE emphasised that in the new
legislation process the role of the European Parliament must
be safeguarded and therefor, Article of the European Agreement
should be amended.
At
its meeting of December 3, ECOFIN accepted the FBE’s statements
and the need to amend Article 202. The European Commission
has initiated the setting up of the committees proposed. The
committees are to start activities at the beginning of 2004.
Forum
group on financial reporting
At
the initiative of ECOFIN, a forum group has been set up with
the participation of professionals from the financial sector,
with the task of comparing financial reporting requirements
in the EU, aiming at their convergence and streamlining. The
forum group published its report in October. The report concluded
that although the diversity of reporting requirements is not
a main obstacle in the way of a single European market, compiling
varied and inconsistent reports causes financial institutions
substantial extra costs. The regulatory environments also
differ by sector and country, members of financial groups
must meet different reporting requirements.
According
to the forum group’s proposal, reporting requirements should
be harmonised at the European level. Within this, it should
also be reviewed how data requested by the authorities are
actually used. Also, the possibility of setting up a single
European database with access by the competent authorities
of member states should be looked into.
The
European Commission reviewed the report with representatives
of the financial sector. European credit institutions endorsed
the report and urged the Commission to move forward with the
issue.
Financial
conglomerates
The
European Parliament passed the directive on the additional
supervision of financial conglomerates in November. It will
be of fundamental importance for member states to apply this
directive (to be introduced in a year and a half time) properly
and consistently. The disclosure of supervisory practices
and consultation mechanisms between supervisory authorities
may largely contribute to the uniform introduction of the
directive, ensuring level playing field.
1.2
Accounts Committee
Proposed
modifications to IAS 39 and IAS 32 were in the focus of the
Accounts Committee’s activities in 2002. The FBE indicated
towards the IAS Board that the strict restrictions on hedge
accounting and the exclusion of internal contacts were against
banks’ risk management practices and hampered efficient assets-liabilities
management.
The
working paper on the proposed modifications of IAS 39 and
IAS 32 (Exposure Draft) contains a number of essential changes
compared to the previous proposal but does not address the
most important issues raised by the banking industry. In addition,
it proposes without previous consultation loan valuation and
provisioning approaches that are substantially different from
the prevailing international standards and the US GAAP.
Critics
of the working paper emphasise: the task of accounting is
to provide a true and fair view of the business and financial
operations of an entity, but it is not the task of accounting
to change such activities. IAS 39, however, interferes with
such operations and by restricting hedge accounting and excluding
internal contracts, it results in inaccurate information in
the financial reports.
In
parallel with the FBE, CEO’s of the largest European banks
also indicated these problems in a joint letter to the IASB.
Upon the comments and proposals received, on December 18 the
IASB announced that it would hold two public round table conferences
for the reviewing organisations to discuss the proposals made
to improve IAS 39 and IAS 32.
The
Accounts Committee’s addressed a number of other important
issues during its meetings in 2002. Key issues included the
proposed standard on Full Fair Value Accounting (postponed
for the time being); Pillar 3 of the new Basel Capital Accord,
the European introduction of IAS in 2005; the modernization
of European accounting directives; and the directive on disclosure
requirements for securities issuers operating on the regulated
market. The Committee reviewed the Sarbanas-Oxley Act, enacted
in the US in protection of investors, and in its letter to
the SEC challenged those provisions of the Act which are prejudicial
to European banks. The Committee reviewed proposals for changes
to the rules on provisioning; the consultation paper on the
application of accounting standards in the EU, published by
the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) in
October; the Winter report on company law and corporate governance;
and the IASB working paper on share-based payments. The Committee
has been following closely the activities of EFRAG6,
as well.
1.3
Fiscal Committee
Taxation
of savings
In
order to avoid tax competition between member states, the
European Council, on December 11, 2002, adopted a Directive
for the taxation of savings, aimed at applying uniform taxation
rules for revenues from savings. The original proposal intended
to introduce the uniform rules from January 1, 2004. Given
that banks will need at least one year for developing and
testing a system to comply with the new directives, the FBE
supported the request that the date of introduction be modified
to January 1, 2005.
Issues
related to Value Added Tax
Investigations
within the EU on a strategy for value added tax began in June
2000. Particular attention was given to particular aspects
of the financial sector, given that some of these institutions
are operating on a global level and are consequently faced
with several problems. Most problems, such as costs allocation,
cross-border services, relations between branch offices and
parent institutions, the practice of refunding VAT, etc. stem
from the fact that the relevant taxation rules vary in the
member states and their financial impacts vary as well.
The
FBE is of the opinion that banking professionals should dedicate
more attention to the issue of VAT in the coming years. Accordingly,
it proposes to set up a working group to develop VAT categories
for the various financial services. The objective is to develop
a setting that is in conformance with the relevant European
directives, helps reduce operating expenses and does not hurt
fair competition. Banks should agree on the internal distributions
of costs. VAT consolidation should be implemented slowly,
step-by-step.
Rules
for banking secrecy
The
Financial Committee of the FBE (FC) in co-operation with the
Fraud Working Group (FWG) compiled in a table the regulations
on banking secrecy in EU member countries and associate countries.
Members of the Committee found this inventory very useful,
as differences in the practices applied in the various countries
are instantly apparent form the table. Legislators may also
deduct useful conclusions from the comparison.
Implementation
of intermediary agreements (QIA)
In
the USA the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Services (IRS)
drafted in 1997 a new regulation on withholding tax for non-American
financial mediators. The Qualified Intermediary Agreement
(QIA) is aimed at simplifying reporting and taxation obligations
for account holders on revenues arising by way of foreign
intermediaries. The QIA requires the engagement of external
auditors. Directives on auditing were published in August
2002 and they contained temporary relieves up to the end of
2002. In this context the FBE, representing the banks, was
of the opinion that more time would be needed for studying
the directives and expressed its concern also that the requirement
of engaging external auditors would charge significant costs
to those financial intermediaries who operate with a low profit
margin.
The
FBE proposed to review the directives from the point of view
of how costs could be reduced without hurting the taxation
aspects. At the proposal of the FBE the final auditing directives
significantly reduced the range in which the engagement of
external auditors is required, as the amounts falling under
the directives were changed. Although the FBE regards this
as a positive step forward, its further concern is that European
partners – due to infrastructure reasons – will not be able
to comply with the IRS requirements; therefore, it requested
that the transition period be extended.
Company
taxation
The
European Commission compiled a working paper with the title
"Corporate Taxation in the European Market". Commission
set the goal of developing a strategy by which the single
market is not burdened with taxation problems. According to
the Commission a consolidated tax base should be developed
for activities pursued within the EU for companies, as this
would be indispensable for making the EU one of the most competitive
economies in the world, as formulated by the Council of Europe
in March 2000 in Lisbon.
This
topic requires a wide-ranging preparatory work and professional
discussion. The key issue is that if a separate tax account
is set up, how would this account be linked to the financial
report. The issue will be further studied and discussed by
accounting and taxation experts with the participation of
the FBE.
1.4
Annual meeting of associate members of the European Banking
Federation
At
the annual meeting of associate members of the European Banking
Federation, held in December, participants were briefed by
EU officials on the schedule of enlargement and related tasks,
contents of new EU financial regulations currently being drafted
and related comments of the European Banking Federation.
The
participants exchanged views on the enlargement of the European
Banking Federation proposed to be carried out simultaneously
with the EU enlargement: according to the proposal, current
associate members would become full members of the Federation
upon accession. This would open up the way for new members
to participate in all organisations of the EBF and the system
of paying membership fees would change as well. The latter
would mean that the current associate members would then also
pay the membership fee according to a factor established on
the basis of the combined balance sheet total and staff numbers
of the banks represented. In the case of Hungary, this factor
is 1%, i.e. we would have to pay as membership fee 1% of the
Federation’s budget. (This would not be a significant increase
compared to the current fee.)
Given
that in the case of the smallest countries membership fees
would grow substantially, associate members will conduct further
consultations on a possible reduction of the membership fees
or a gradual introduction of the calculated factors.
1.5
Payment
Systems Steering Group
The
Association's representative attends the meetings of the
Payment System Steering Group of ECBS from time to time,
depending on the topics addressed. Two major issues we addressed
in 2002: efficient representation of European banks vis-á-vis
the various authorities in the EU and the new EU regulation
on banking charges on international transfers within the EU.
The issue of charges on transfers within the EU became a focal
issue because a radical regulatory measure of the European
Commission has created a fundamentally new situation. Leading
organs of the EU had long been asking, in vain, that banks
harmonise their transfer charges by the time the single European
currency is introduced, as it would be difficult to explain
why charges on domestic and cross-border transfers would significantly
differ within an economically integrated area (the EMU). Banks
in Europe made a significant progress in making transfers
more accurate and less expensive by introducing various standards
(e.g.: the IBAN, IPI) and by cutting administration (for example,
by reducing statistical reporting requirements); however,
due to the different giro systems and infrastructures and
service charge policies, no breakthrough has been achieved.
Given that the various EU member countries (and within that,
the individual banks) apply different bank charge policies
to domestic and international payments, the varied policies
on domestic payments cannot be applied to the ever growing
volume of international payments.
Despite
protest by banks’ interest representation organisations and
arguments by the European Central Banks, EU decision-makers,
simultaneously with the introduction of Euro cash, decided
that bank charges on international payments should not differ
from those on domestic payments. The relevant regulation has
been effective for bank card payments since 2002 and will
apply to international payments from mid-2003.
Not
much time has been left for the banking community to resolve
the issue. One thing is clear: a joint action is required.
Problems around the payment systems have just highlighted
the importance of co-operation between banks and banking associations
in the EU. Leading European organisations (the European Commission,
the European Parliament, the European Central Bank) have requested
several times that the banking community appoint one representative
organisation to be the counterpart for the various EU authorities
in all issues. The FBE aims to play a leading organising role
in this effort and has developed several proposals. The objective
is to create a European banking organisation with a supreme
body that would represent all main branches of the banking
industry (national banking associations, European banking
associations, major professional organisations, international
banking groups, etc.) while remaining efficient and operative
in performing its responsibilities of internal coordination,
representing banks’ interests externally and managing the
various working committees.
The
Association's representative is regularly invited to the meetings
of the European Committee for Banking Standards (ECBS).
The
ECBS is also facing serious organisational challenges. Despite
its relatively short history, the ECBS has had significant
achievements (e.g., in developing and introducing IBAN worldwide).
However, it is facing serious criticism for its scattered
and unorganised "shop works" and consequently, the
low interest shown in the resulting standards. Therefore,
the ECBS intends to simplify its organisation and reform its
management and operations by increasing the weight of senior
bankers in its leading bodies (thus far dominated by leaders
of interest representation organisations).
1.6
Bank Security Working Group
Fight
against terrorism and money laundering
Most
European countries criticised the general practice used in
the fight against terrorism and money laundering. The main
points: the number of regulations is increasing day-by-day,
entailing constantly increasing costs; the rules are inefficient
and fail to bring the desired results; banks are often forced
to illegally check on their clients.
According
to experts the current situation is unconstitutional from
several points of view and should be discussed by the European
Parliament. It would also be necessary to put pressure on
the legislators to re-assess what the actual objective of
the regulations should be. A new way of thinking would be
required in relation to risks, efficiency, costs, and lawfulness.
2. Single
interest representation organisation of European payment institutions
Developing
a new, single European interest representation organisation
for payment institutions took considerable energy of the European
Banking Federation, the federation of national banking associations.
At the request of EU institutions (the Central Bank, the Commission,
etc.), a new organisation has been set up to efficiently organise
and represent the interests of the founding institutions (including
different types of banks) at the EU level.
The
supreme decision-making body of the new organisation is the
European Payments Council (EPC). The Council has 52 members,
including small and large banks, other financial institutions
and national banking associations. Professional activities
are performed within the framework of five working committees
specialising in the areas of payment infrastructure, small
international transfers, customer needs survey, bank cards
and cash payments. Activities of the working committees are
controlled by a coordinating committee which is also responsible
for implementing the resolutions adopted by the Council.
Although
no one questions the need for a single interest representation
organisation, doubts have been expressed at several forums
on the efficiency of management of affairs under the new organisation.
What gives the issue special importance is that while EU authorities
and the EU Parliament are making special efforts to create
a Single European Payment Area (SEPA), given their own internal
organisational problems interest representation organisations
have limited energy left for this important EU-level regulation.
The
European Committee on Banking Standards (ECBS) has followed
the forming of the EPC with keen interest; with so many achievements
and blunders in its own activities, the ECBS expects efficient
and professional guidance from this forum. The EPC appears
as an external control body in the transformation plans of
the ECBS.
DRAFT
RESOLUTION
The
Board Meeting discussed and adopted the Report on 2002 Activities
of Hungarian Banking Association.
Budapest,
March 20, 2003
Dr.
Rezsõ Nyers
Secretary
General
|